Nevertheless, they stays available to the way the reader identifies this work, which is the substance out-of condition
Medical research, try out measures, overall performance and you will perceptions try designed regarding mind, also creativity and you can keyword and you will concept coding. The best revealing of show is also crucial. Particularly in theoretic physics, linguistic skill and you can carefulness if you are creating get a pressing you would like into the the newest victims at horizons away from current knowledge. There are people from most other fields who are willing to get me wrong and you will spark a lot of discourses/conclusions; it establish guides off a number of bytes of data like “yes/no/maybe”; consequently, nonscience or occult misinformation is provided, types of and that are plentiful regarding the fields from special relativity principle and you can quantum physics. Therefore, research should not make use of the phrases that served new Paleolithic notice. Category: Standard Research and you will Opinions
Trappist-step 1 Superstar System
New James Webb Place Telescope (JWST) will soon transcend just what Hubble has been able to mention. Certainly its first goals can be this new TRAPPIST-1 celebrity program within the Aquarius. It essay explores as to why one puny reddish dwarf is really so interesting, and just why brand new search for alien existence variations age. Category: Standard Science and Thinking
Physical dimensions like “mass”, “length”, “charge”, represented by the symbols $[M], [L], [Q]$, are <\it>, but used as <\it>to perform dimensional analysis in particular, and to write the equations of physics in general, by the physicist. The law of excluded middle falls short of explaining the contradictory meanings of the same symbols. The statements like “$m\to 0$”, “$r\to 0$”, “$q\to 0$”, used by the physicist, are inconsistent on dimensional grounds because “$ m$”, “$r$”, “$q$” represent <\it>with physical dimensions of $[M], [L], [Q]$ respectively and “$0$” represents just a number — devoid of physical dimension. Consequently, the involvement of the statement “$\lim_$, where $q$ is the test charge” in the definition of electric field, leads to either circular reasoning or a contradiction regarding the experimental verification of the smallest charge in the Millikan-Fletcher oil drop experiment. Considering such issues as problematic, by choice, I make an inquiry regarding the basic language in terms of which physics is written, with an aim of exploring how truthfully the verbal statements can be converted to the corresponding physico-mathematical expressions, where “physico-mathematical” signifies the involvement of physical dimensions. Such investigation necessitates an explanation by demonstration of “self inquiry”, “middle way”, “dependent origination”, “emptiness/relational existence”, which are certain terms that signify the basic tenets of Buddhism. In light of such demonstration I explain my view of “definition”; the relations free Spanking Sites online dating among quantity, physical dimension and number; meaninglessness of “zero quantity” and the associated logico-linguistic fallacy; difference between unit and unity. Considering the importance of the notion of electric field in physics, I present a critical analysis of the definitions of electric field due to Maxwell and Jackson, along with the physico-mathematical conversions of the verbal statements. The analysis of Jackson’s definition points towards an expression of the electric field as an infinite series due to the associated “limiting process” of the test charge. However, it brings out the necessity of a postulate regarding the existence of charges, which nevertheless follows from the definition of quantity. Consequently, I explain the notion of <\it>that act as the middle way to resolve the contradiction regarding the Millikan-Fletcher oil drop experiment. In passing, I provide a logico-linguistic analysis, in physico-mathematical terms, of two verbal statements of Maxwell in relation to his definition of electric field, which suggests Maxwell’s conception of dependent origination of distance and charge (i.e. $[L]\equiv[Q]$) and that of emptiness in the context of relative vacuum (in contrast to modern absolute vacuum). This work is an appeal for the dissociation of the categorical disciplines of logic and physics and on the large, a fruitful merger of Eastern philosophy and Western science. Category: General Science and Philosophy
لا تعليق